Percentage-of-revenue rules borrowed from other industries produce the wrong answer for clubs. Here is the math that actually determines what your budget should be.
Boards ask this question every budget cycle, and the answers usually come from the wrong place: a percentage-of-revenue rule borrowed from retail, or whatever the club spent last year plus a small increase.
Neither reflects how club membership economics actually work. A better answer starts with what a member is worth.
A private club member is not a transaction. They are a multi-year revenue relationship: initiation, annual dues, and ongoing spend across dining, events, golf, and retail, for as long as they stay.
Take a club with a $20,000 initiation fee and $8,000 in annual dues, where the average member stays eight years. That relationship is worth $84,000 in dues and initiation alone, before any ancillary spend. These figures are illustrative — run them with your own numbers, including your actual average tenure, which most clubs can calculate and few have.
Against a number like that, an acquisition cost of a few thousand dollars per member is not an expense to be minimized. It is one of the highest-return uses of capital available to the club.
Rules like "spend 5 percent of revenue on marketing" assume a business that must continuously replace transactional customers. A club with a full roster and a healthy waitlist may rationally spend close to nothing. A club with 40 open spots and a shrinking waitlist may rationally spend many multiples of any percentage rule for a period.
Marketing spend at a club should follow capacity and urgency, not a fixed ratio. The question is not what percentage is normal. It is how many memberships you need to sell, what each is worth, and what it currently costs you to produce one.
If you know what it costs to acquire one member, the budget answers itself. Need twelve members and each costs $2,500 to acquire? That is a $30,000 budget with a defensible basis, which is a very different board conversation than "we would like more marketing money."
Most clubs cannot produce that number, because inquiries are not tracked back to their originating channel. That tracking is the prerequisite for every budget conversation that follows, and it is a CRM capability rather than an advertising one.
Until you have it, you are not budgeting. You are guessing, and defending the guess annually.
There is a case where increasing the budget is the wrong move, and it is more common than boards expect: when the club cannot handle the inquiries it already receives.
We submitted membership inquiries to 109 private clubs and more than a third never responded at all, while roughly three-quarters of those that did led with a price rather than a conversation. Full findings are in our inquiry response study.
If that describes your club, additional spend buys more inquiries into a process that is already dropping them. The return on fixing response time is immediate and costs nothing in media. Spend there first.
One practical note for budgeting. Advertising spend and the cost of managing campaigns are different line items, and conflating them produces bad decisions — usually cutting management to preserve media, which reliably makes the media perform worse.
Budget them separately so the board can see what is buying attention and what is making that attention productive.
Set the membership target for the year. Establish what it currently costs to produce one member, or commit to measuring it if you cannot. Confirm the club can actually respond to the inquiries the spend will generate. Then size the budget against the target, and report on cost per member rather than on impressions.
If you would rather have that built and run for you, with reporting written for a board rather than exported from an ad platform, that is what our club marketing engagements cover. If the underlying question is whether marketing is even your constraint, a membership audit answers that first.
Enough to hit the membership target at your actual cost per acquired member. Percentage-of-revenue rules borrowed from other industries mislead, because a club at capacity may rationally spend almost nothing while a club with significant open capacity may rationally spend far more. Size the budget against the number of memberships needed and what each currently costs to produce.
It depends entirely on what a member is worth at your club. Compare acquisition cost against initiation plus dues across the average member tenure. When a member relationship is worth tens of thousands of dollars over several years, an acquisition cost in the low thousands is generally a strong return — but you cannot evaluate it without first tracking inquiries back to their originating channel.
Not before confirming the club can handle the inquiries it already receives. In a study of 109 private clubs, more than a third never responded to a membership inquiry. Where that is the case, additional spend generates more inquiries into a process that is already losing them, and fixing response time produces a better return at no media cost.
Yes. They are different line items and conflating them tends to result in cutting management to preserve media spend, which reliably makes the media perform worse. Budget them separately so leadership can see what is buying attention and what is making that attention productive.
Let's talk about how AshGro can help your club.
Join private club leaders who get our monthly newsletter, written for general managers and membership directors who want practical ideas they can put to work right away. No fluff, no spam.
Sent once a month. Unsubscribe anytime.